State of Gujarat vs SURESHBHAI NAGJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B JOSHI — 1755/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,B,C,D,E,F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN070031362025
Filing Number
1755/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Registration No
1755/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALITANA
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198042250920
Police Station
PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURESHBHAI NAGJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B JOSHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Sureshbhai Nagjibhai Parmar The court acquitted the accused Sureshbhai Nagjibhai Parmar of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(B,C,D,E,F). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the panchnama (seizure record) was not adequately supported by independent witness testimony and no FSL report confirmed the seized materials were illicit alcohol. Applying established judicial principles, the court held that when critical evidence like the panchnama remains unproven and independent witnesses are unavailable, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1755/2025
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Sureshbhai Nagjibhai Parmar The court acquitted the accused Sureshbhai Nagjibhai Parmar of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(B,C,D,E,F). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the panchnama (seizure record) was not adequately supported by independent witness testimony and no FSL report confirmed the seized materials were illicit alcohol. Applying established judicial principles, the court held that when critical evidence like the panchnama remains unproven and independent witnesses are unavailable, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts