MAMAIYABHAI SAGARAMBHAI GID PROPRIETOR OF VADVALA FINANCE vs VIKRAMBHAI RATIBHAI GOHIL — 1743/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 17th April 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN070031192025

Filing Number

1743/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

1743/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAMAIYABHAI SAGARAMBHAI GID PROPRIETOR OF VADVALA FINANCE

    Adv. K H RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIKRAMBHAI RATIBHAI GOHIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the case on April 17, 2026, after the complainant (Mamaiyabhai Sagarambhai Gid) confirmed that the cheque amount had been received from the defendant (Vikrambhai Ratibhai Gohil) and no longer wished to pursue the matter. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Palanpur resolved the case based on this settlement reached before the Lok Adalat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1743/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the case on April 17, 2026, after the complainant (Mamaiyabhai Sagarambhai Gid) confirmed that the cheque amount had been received from the defendant (Vikrambhai Ratibhai Gohil) and no longer wished to pursue the matter. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Palanpur resolved the case based on this settlement reached before the Lok Adalat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case