State of Gujarat vs REKHABEN URFE ARATIBEN CHANDUBHAI VASHARAMBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI — 318/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN070005642026

Case disposed

Filing Number

318/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

318/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198042260076

Police Station

PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

REKHABEN URFE ARATIBEN CHANDUBHAI VASHARAMBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

27-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case 318/2026 Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palit­ana acquitted the accused Rekhaben under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(A), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (seizure record) lacked substantiation from independent witnesses, the FSL report on the seized substance was absent from court records, and the panch witnesses' testimony did not corroborate the prosecution's allegations. Applying established precedent that panch witnesses who fail to support the prosecution's case cannot be relied upon, the court ruled the prosecution did not discharge its burden of proof and acquitted the accused while disposing of the seized contraband according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 318/2026 Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palit­ana acquitted the accused Rekhaben under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(A), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (seizure record) lacked substantiation from independent witnesses, the FSL report on the seized substance was absent from court records, and the panch witnesses' testimony did not corroborate the prosecution's allegations. Applying established precedent that panch witnesses who fail to support the prosecution's case cannot be relied upon, the court ruled the prosecution did not discharge its burden of proof and acquitted the accused while disposing of the seized contraband according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case