State of Gujarat vs REKHABEN URFE ARATIBEN CHANDUBHAI VASHARAMBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI — 318/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN070005642026
Filing Number
318/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
318/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALITANA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198042260076
Police Station
PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
REKHABEN URFE ARATIBEN CHANDUBHAI VASHARAMBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 318/2026 Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palitana acquitted the accused Rekhaben under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(A), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (seizure record) lacked substantiation from independent witnesses, the FSL report on the seized substance was absent from court records, and the panch witnesses' testimony did not corroborate the prosecution's allegations. Applying established precedent that panch witnesses who fail to support the prosecution's case cannot be relied upon, the court ruled the prosecution did not discharge its burden of proof and acquitted the accused while disposing of the seized contraband according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 318/2026 Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palitana acquitted the accused Rekhaben under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(A), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (seizure record) lacked substantiation from independent witnesses, the FSL report on the seized substance was absent from court records, and the panch witnesses' testimony did not corroborate the prosecution's allegations. Applying established precedent that panch witnesses who fail to support the prosecution's case cannot be relied upon, the court ruled the prosecution did not discharge its burden of proof and acquitted the accused while disposing of the seized contraband according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts