State of Gujarat vs JAGDISHBHAI RAMESHBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - A B JOSHI — 304/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN070005482026
Filing Number
304/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
304/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALITANA
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198042251142
Police Station
PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAGDISHBHAI RAMESHBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - A B JOSHI
-
2.VALJIBHAI BHAGVANBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. A B JOSHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 304/2026 The court acquitted both accused (Jagdishbhai Rameshbhai Solanki and Valjibhai Bhagvanbhai Vaghela) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, sections 65(AA) and 81, finding the prosecution's case unproven. The court determined that the panchnama (search document) lacked credible corroboration, the independent witnesses' testimony contradicted the complainant's case, no FSL report confirmed the seized material was liquor, and the prosecution failed to establish the offense beyond reasonable doubt, thereby granting benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 304/2026
Summary of Case 304/2026 The court acquitted both accused (Jagdishbhai Rameshbhai Solanki and Valjibhai Bhagvanbhai Vaghela) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, sections 65(AA) and 81, finding the prosecution's case unproven. The court determined that the panchnama (search document) lacked credible corroboration, the independent witnesses' testimony contradicted the complainant's case, no FSL report confirmed the seized material was liquor, and the prosecution failed to establish the offense beyond reasonable doubt, thereby granting benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts