State of Gujarat vs BAVUBEN MANOJBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI — 295/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN070005392026
Filing Number
295/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
295/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALITANA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198042251125
Police Station
PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BAVUBEN MANOJBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 295/2026 The court acquitted advocate Bavuben Manojbhai Vaghela of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the panchnama (seizure document) was not properly corroborated, independent witnesses were not examined, and no FSL report confirmed the seized substance was liquor, making the alleged offense unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 295/2026 The court acquitted advocate Bavuben Manojbhai Vaghela of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the panchnama (seizure document) was not properly corroborated, independent witnesses were not examined, and no FSL report confirmed the seized substance was liquor, making the alleged offense unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts