State of Gujarat vs SUBIBEN BUDHABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI — 294/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN070005382026
Filing Number
294/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
294/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALITANA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198042251199
Police Station
PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SUBIBEN BUDHABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C.NO.294/2026 The court acquitted advocate Subiben Budhabhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that prohibited liquor was found in the accused's possession, as the panchnama (seizure document) lacked credible corroboration and no FSL report confirmed the seized substance's nature. The court found the prosecution's case insufficient and granted the accused benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.NO.294/2026 The court acquitted advocate Subiben Budhabhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that prohibited liquor was found in the accused's possession, as the panchnama (seizure document) lacked credible corroboration and no FSL report confirmed the seized substance's nature. The court found the prosecution's case insufficient and granted the accused benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts