State of Gujarat vs KAJALBEN ROHITBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B JOSHI — 292/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN070005362026

Filing Number

292/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

292/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198042251202

Police Station

PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAJALBEN ROHITBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 292/2026 The court acquitted respondent Kajalben Rohitbhai Parmar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to adequately prove its case. The court noted that the panch witnesses (independent witnesses) who testified did not substantively support the allegations, the seized material lacked FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) confirmation, and critical evidentiary gaps existed regarding the nature of the allegedly prohibited substance. Applying established precedent, the court held that when independent witnesses do not support the complainant's case and material contradictions exist in witness statements, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 292/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 292/2026 The court acquitted respondent Kajalben Rohitbhai Parmar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to adequately prove its case. The court noted that the panch witnesses (independent witnesses) who testified did not substantively support the allegations, the seized material lacked FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) confirmation, and critical evidentiary gaps existed regarding the nature of the allegedly prohibited substance. Applying established precedent, the court held that when independent witnesses do not support the complainant's case and material contradictions exist in witness statements, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case