State of Gujarat vs GITABEN DULABHAI HIRABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI — 253/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN070004902026

Case disposed

Filing Number

253/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

253/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198042251113

Police Station

PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

GITABEN DULABHAI HIRABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

17-04-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Case 253/2026 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palitana, acquitted the accused Gitaben Dulabhai Hirabhai Vaghela of charges under Section 65(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that the State failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that prohibited liquor was recovered from the accused without a valid permit, as the panchnama (seizure record) lacked credible corroboration and an FSL report was absent to confirm the seized material's nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 253/2026 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palitana, acquitted the accused Gitaben Dulabhai Hirabhai Vaghela of charges under Section 65(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that the State failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that prohibited liquor was recovered from the accused without a valid permit, as the panchnama (seizure record) lacked credible corroboration and an FSL report was absent to confirm the seized material's nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case