State of Gujarat vs BASUBEN GHELABHAI AMARABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI — 252/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN070004892026

Case disposed

Filing Number

252/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198042251082

Police Station

PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BASUBEN GHELABHAI AMARABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

17-04-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: C.C. No. 252/2026 The court acquitted the accused, Basuben Ghelabhai Amarabhai Vaghela, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (seizure record) was not properly substantiated, independent witnesses were not examined, FSL reports on the seized contraband were absent, and the panchs who testified could not corroborate the prosecution's allegations. Applying established legal precedent, the court held that when key evidence remains unproven and suspicions arise regarding seized materials, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt. The accused was discharged and existing bail conditions continued during appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. No. 252/2026 The court acquitted the accused, Basuben Ghelabhai Amarabhai Vaghela, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (seizure record) was not properly substantiated, independent witnesses were not examined, FSL reports on the seized contraband were absent, and the panchs who testified could not corroborate the prosecution's allegations. Applying established legal precedent, the court held that when key evidence remains unproven and suspicions arise regarding seized materials, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt. The accused was discharged and existing bail conditions continued during appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case