State of Gujarat vs KAILASBEN SURESHBHAI NAGJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B JOSHI — 248/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN070004852026
Filing Number
248/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
248/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALITANA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198042251206
Police Station
PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KAILASBEN SURESHBHAI NAGJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kailasben Sureshbhai Nagjibhai Parmar (C.C.NO.248-2026) The court acquitted the accused Kailasben of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to substantiate its case. The judge noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (formal inventory) lacked proper corroboration, independent witnesses were not examined, and no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report confirmed the seized material was illicit liquor. Applying precedent principles, the court held that when panchas (witnesses) provide unreliable testimony and independent corroboration is absent, the accused deserves benefit of doubt. The defendant was discharged and acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kailasben Sureshbhai Nagjibhai Parmar (C.C.NO.248-2026) The court acquitted the accused Kailasben of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to substantiate its case. The judge noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (formal inventory) lacked proper corroboration, independent witnesses were not examined, and no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report confirmed the seized material was illicit liquor. Applying precedent principles, the court held that when panchas (witnesses) provide unreliable testimony and independent corroboration is absent, the accused deserves benefit of doubt. The defendant was discharged and acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts