State of Gujarat vs KAILASBEN SURESHBHAI NAGJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B JOSHI — 248/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN070004852026

Filing Number

248/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

248/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198042251206

Police Station

PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAILASBEN SURESHBHAI NAGJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kailasben Sureshbhai Nagjibhai Parmar (C.C.NO.248-2026) The court acquitted the accused Kailasben of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to substantiate its case. The judge noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (formal inventory) lacked proper corroboration, independent witnesses were not examined, and no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report confirmed the seized material was illicit liquor. Applying precedent principles, the court held that when panchas (witnesses) provide unreliable testimony and independent corroboration is absent, the accused deserves benefit of doubt. The defendant was discharged and acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 248/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kailasben Sureshbhai Nagjibhai Parmar (C.C.NO.248-2026) The court acquitted the accused Kailasben of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to substantiate its case. The judge noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (formal inventory) lacked proper corroboration, independent witnesses were not examined, and no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report confirmed the seized material was illicit liquor. Applying precedent principles, the court held that when panchas (witnesses) provide unreliable testimony and independent corroboration is absent, the accused deserves benefit of doubt. The defendant was discharged and acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case