State of Gujarat vs SHOBHABEN HIMMATBHAI KANABHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B JOSHI — 237/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN070004742026

Filing Number

237/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

237/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198042251193

Police Station

PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHOBHABEN HIMMATBHAI KANABHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Shobhaben Himmatbhai Kanabhai Parmar The court acquitted the accused Shobhaben Himmatbhai Kanabhai Parmar of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (seizure document) was not substantiated by independent witnesses; the seized material was not forensically tested to establish it was prohibited liquor; and the independent panch witnesses testified without corroborating the prosecution's allegations. Following precedent law, the court held that when panchas contradict the prosecution case and independent witnesses are not examined, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt. The accused was acquitted and released on existing bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Shobhaben Himmatbhai Kanabhai Parmar The court acquitted the accused Shobhaben Himmatbhai Kanabhai Parmar of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchnama (seizure document) was not substantiated by independent witnesses; the seized material was not forensically tested to establish it was prohibited liquor; and the independent panch witnesses testified without corroborating the prosecution's allegations. Following precedent law, the court held that when panchas contradict the prosecution case and independent witnesses are not examined, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt. The accused was acquitted and released on existing bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case