State of Gujarat vs REKHABEN MANGABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI — 233/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN070004702026

Case disposed

Filing Number

233/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

233/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198042251146

Police Station

PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

REKHABEN MANGABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A B JOSHI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

27-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Rekhaben Mangabhai Vaghela Case No.: 233/2026 | Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palitana Decision: The accused Rekhaben Mangabhai Vaghela was acquitted of charges under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the seizure memo (panchnama) was not adequately corroborated by independent witnesses and no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the seized contraband was alcohol. The court held that without substantiating the panchnama's authenticity, the remaining prosecution evidence could not support the conviction, citing established precedents that when panches (witnesses) are recalled witnesses and key corroborative evidence is absent, the benefit of doubt must go to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Rekhaben Mangabhai Vaghela Case No.: 233/2026 | Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palitana Decision: The accused Rekhaben Mangabhai Vaghela was acquitted of charges under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the seizure memo (panchnama) was not adequately corroborated by independent witnesses and no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the seized contraband was alcohol. The court held that without substantiating the panchnama's authenticity, the remaining prosecution evidence could not support the conviction, citing established precedents that when panches (witnesses) are recalled witnesses and key corroborative evidence is absent, the benefit of doubt must go to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case