SAJIDKHA BABUKHA PATHAN vs HIREN KIRITBHAI URFE KIRTIBHAI DEVLUK — 145/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN070003142026

Filing Number

145/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

145/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAJIDKHA BABUKHA PATHAN

    Adv. N R CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HIREN KIRITBHAI URFE KIRTIBHAI DEVLUK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 145/2026 Summary The court disposed of the case through Lok Adalat (public settlement) after the petitioner Sajidkha Babukha Pathan reached a settlement with the respondent Hiren Kiritbhai Urfe Kirtibhai Devluk. The respondent paid the petitioner's outstanding debt amount in full, and the petitioner withdrew the case and did not wish to pursue it further. The judgment was pronounced on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Copies To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Copies To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 145/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 145/2026 Summary The court disposed of the case through Lok Adalat (public settlement) after the petitioner Sajidkha Babukha Pathan reached a settlement with the respondent Hiren Kiritbhai Urfe Kirtibhai Devluk. The respondent paid the petitioner's outstanding debt amount in full, and the petitioner withdrew the case and did not wish to pursue it further. The judgment was pronounced on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case