PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs KANTIBHAI RAVJIBHAI CHAUHAN — 427/2024
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060013102024
Filing Number
427/2024
Filing Date
18-12-2024
Registration No
427/2024
Registration Date
18-12-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
KANTIBHAI RAVJIBHAI CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS 427/2024 PGVCL Gariyadhar v. Kantibhai Ravjibhai Chauhan The court partially allowed the petitioner power company's claim against the respondent for unauthorized electricity theft. The court held that the respondent illegally drew power directly from the company's distribution line without authorization and ordered payment of Rs. 26,371/10 with 6% annual interest from the claim date until recovery, plus costs. The court directed recovery from the respondent's property and imposed the full judgment debt, partially dismissing claims regarding certain penalty interest calculations while upholding the core recovery against the respondent for theft of electricity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 427/2024 PGVCL Gariyadhar v. Kantibhai Ravjibhai Chauhan The court partially allowed the petitioner power company's claim against the respondent for unauthorized electricity theft. The court held that the respondent illegally drew power directly from the company's distribution line without authorization and ordered payment of Rs. 26,371/10 with 6% annual interest from the claim date until recovery, plus costs. The court directed recovery from the respondent's property and imposed the full judgment debt, partially dismissing claims regarding certain penalty interest calculations while upholding the core recovery against the respondent for theft of electricity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts