PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs MAHESHBHAI GIRJASHANKAR TRIVEDI — 262/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060010492025
Filing Number
262/2025
Filing Date
07-10-2025
Registration No
262/2025
Registration Date
07-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
MAHESHBHAI GIRJASHANKAR TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS No. 262/2025 PGVCL (Petitioner) v. Maheshbhai Girjashankar Trivedi (Respondent) The court partially allowed PGVCL's petition against the respondent for unauthorized electricity theft and non-payment of dues. The respondent had illegally connected to PGVCL's power line and consumed electricity without authorization, accumulating outstanding bills of ₹2,52,022/20 plus minimum charges. The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount with 6% annual interest from the billing date until payment, and authorized recovery from the respondent's property and movable assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 262/2025 PGVCL (Petitioner) v. Maheshbhai Girjashankar Trivedi (Respondent) The court partially allowed PGVCL's petition against the respondent for unauthorized electricity theft and non-payment of dues. The respondent had illegally connected to PGVCL's power line and consumed electricity without authorization, accumulating outstanding bills of ₹2,52,022/20 plus minimum charges. The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount with 6% annual interest from the billing date until payment, and authorized recovery from the respondent's property and movable assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts