PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs GU. JUVANSINH GANUBHA NA VARASPUTRA ANOPSINH JUVANSINH — 260/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060010472025
Filing Number
260/2025
Filing Date
07-10-2025
Registration No
260/2025
Registration Date
07-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
GU. JUVANSINH GANUBHA NA VARASPUTRA ANOPSINH JUVANSINH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS No. 260 of 2025 PGVCL Gariyadhar v. Gu. Juvansinh Ganubha na Varasputra Anopsinh Juvansinh The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim for recovery of outstanding electricity dues of ₹2,09,172/88 against the respondent. The court decreed that the respondent must pay the claimed amount with 6% annual interest from the claim date until full payment, and the outstanding amount is recoverable from the respondent's property. The court found the plaintiff's evidence credible and the respondent's failure to appear or contest the claim fatal to their defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 260 of 2025 PGVCL Gariyadhar v. Gu. Juvansinh Ganubha na Varasputra Anopsinh Juvansinh The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim for recovery of outstanding electricity dues of ₹2,09,172/88 against the respondent. The court decreed that the respondent must pay the claimed amount with 6% annual interest from the claim date until full payment, and the outstanding amount is recoverable from the respondent's property. The court found the plaintiff's evidence credible and the respondent's failure to appear or contest the claim fatal to their defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts