PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs SAVJIBHAI RAMJIBHAI JADAV — 259/2025

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 29th April 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060010462025

Filing Number

259/2025

Filing Date

07-Oct-2025

Registration No

259/2025

Registration Date

07-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

    Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAVJIBHAI RAMJIBHAI JADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    The court dismissed the suit filed by PGVCL Gariyadhar's Deputy Engineer against Savjibhai Ramjibhai Jadav due to the petitioner's lack of interest in pursuing the case. The court found that the petitioner's legal representatives showed considerable reluctance and indifference in the proceedings, and the petitioner's successors were unwilling to continue the prosecution, warranting dismissal of the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 07-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 07-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 259/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the suit filed by PGVCL Gariyadhar's Deputy Engineer against Savjibhai Ramjibhai Jadav due to the petitioner's lack of interest in pursuing the case. The court found that the petitioner's legal representatives showed considerable reluctance and indifference in the proceedings, and the petitioner's successors were unwilling to continue the prosecution, warranting dismissal of the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case