PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs ARJANBHAI DHARAMSHIBHAI YADAV — 257/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060010442025
Filing Number
257/2025
Filing Date
07-Oct-2025
Registration No
257/2025
Registration Date
07-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARJANBHAI DHARAMSHIBHAI YADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: RCS No. 257/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's recovery claim against the defendant. The court held that the defendant owes Rs. 30,391.32 in unpaid electricity bills and is liable to pay 6% annual interest from the bill date until payment. The court ordered the defendant to pay the principal amount with interest, and further directed recovery from the defendant's property and assets if necessary, while dismissing claims for higher interest rates and other relief sought by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 257/2025
Case Summary: RCS No. 257/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's recovery claim against the defendant. The court held that the defendant owes Rs. 30,391.32 in unpaid electricity bills and is liable to pay 6% annual interest from the bill date until payment. The court ordered the defendant to pay the principal amount with interest, and further directed recovery from the defendant's property and assets if necessary, while dismissing claims for higher interest rates and other relief sought by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts