PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs GHANSHYAM VASANTDAS KABIRPATH — 256/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060010432025
Filing Number
256/2025
Filing Date
07-10-2025
Registration No
256/2025
Registration Date
07-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
GHANSHYAM VASANTDAS KABIRPATH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS 256/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Ghanshyam Vasantdas Kabirpath for unpaid electricity dues of ₹26,052/83 paise. The judgment held that PGVCL proved its case through documented evidence and the respondent's failure to contest the charges or present a defense. The court ordered the respondent to pay the outstanding electricity bill amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until full recovery, with costs borne by the respondent. The respondent's property is liable for debt recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 256/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Ghanshyam Vasantdas Kabirpath for unpaid electricity dues of ₹26,052/83 paise. The judgment held that PGVCL proved its case through documented evidence and the respondent's failure to contest the charges or present a defense. The court ordered the respondent to pay the outstanding electricity bill amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until full recovery, with costs borne by the respondent. The respondent's property is liable for debt recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts