PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs GHANSHYAM VASANTDAS KABIRPATH — 256/2025

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060010432025

Case disposed

Filing Number

256/2025

Filing Date

07-10-2025

Registration No

256/2025

Registration Date

07-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

GHANSHYAM VASANTDAS KABIRPATH

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

23-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

30-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

19-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

27-11-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: RCS 256/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Ghanshyam Vasantdas Kabirpath for unpaid electricity dues of ₹26,052/83 paise. The judgment held that PGVCL proved its case through documented evidence and the respondent's failure to contest the charges or present a defense. The court ordered the respondent to pay the outstanding electricity bill amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until full recovery, with costs borne by the respondent. The respondent's property is liable for debt recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 256/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Ghanshyam Vasantdas Kabirpath for unpaid electricity dues of ₹26,052/83 paise. The judgment held that PGVCL proved its case through documented evidence and the respondent's failure to contest the charges or present a defense. The court ordered the respondent to pay the outstanding electricity bill amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until full recovery, with costs borne by the respondent. The respondent's property is liable for debt recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case