PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs KANJIBHAI KALABHAI — 248/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060010352025
Filing Number
248/2025
Filing Date
07-10-2025
Registration No
248/2025
Registration Date
07-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
KANJIBHAI KALABHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS No. 248 OF 2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's (Petitioner) claim against Kanjibhai Kalabhai (Respondent) for unpaid electricity charges of Rs. 4,096.51 with applicable interest. The court found that the respondent failed to contest the claim, the electricity connection and outstanding dues were properly established through documentary evidence, and no defense was raised regarding non-payment. The court decreed that the respondent must pay the claimed amount with 6% annual interest from the claim date until payment, and authorized recovery through attachment of the respondent's property if necessary. The respondent was ordered to bear the case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 248 OF 2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's (Petitioner) claim against Kanjibhai Kalabhai (Respondent) for unpaid electricity charges of Rs. 4,096.51 with applicable interest. The court found that the respondent failed to contest the claim, the electricity connection and outstanding dues were properly established through documentary evidence, and no defense was raised regarding non-payment. The court decreed that the respondent must pay the claimed amount with 6% annual interest from the claim date until payment, and authorized recovery through attachment of the respondent's property if necessary. The respondent was ordered to bear the case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts