PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs KANJIBHAI KALABHAI — 248/2025

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060010352025

Case disposed

Filing Number

248/2025

Filing Date

07-10-2025

Registration No

248/2025

Registration Date

07-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

KANJIBHAI KALABHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

23-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

30-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

19-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

27-11-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: RCS No. 248 OF 2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's (Petitioner) claim against Kanjibhai Kalabhai (Respondent) for unpaid electricity charges of Rs. 4,096.51 with applicable interest. The court found that the respondent failed to contest the claim, the electricity connection and outstanding dues were properly established through documentary evidence, and no defense was raised regarding non-payment. The court decreed that the respondent must pay the claimed amount with 6% annual interest from the claim date until payment, and authorized recovery through attachment of the respondent's property if necessary. The respondent was ordered to bear the case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 248 OF 2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's (Petitioner) claim against Kanjibhai Kalabhai (Respondent) for unpaid electricity charges of Rs. 4,096.51 with applicable interest. The court found that the respondent failed to contest the claim, the electricity connection and outstanding dues were properly established through documentary evidence, and no defense was raised regarding non-payment. The court decreed that the respondent must pay the claimed amount with 6% annual interest from the claim date until payment, and authorized recovery through attachment of the respondent's property if necessary. The respondent was ordered to bear the case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case