PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs DEVASHIBHAI JASABHAI GOHIL — 244/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060010312025
Filing Number
244/2025
Filing Date
07-Oct-2025
Registration No
244/2025
Registration Date
07-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEVASHIBHAI JASABHAI GOHIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: RCS No. 244 of 2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against defendant Devashibhai Jasabhai Gohil for outstanding electricity dues of Rs. 12,778.21 with 6% annual interest from the claim date until payment. The court found the defendant failed to contest the charges and ordered recovery from his person, movable property, and immovable assets, while rejecting claims for higher interest rates. The defendant was also directed to bear court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 244/2025
Case Summary: RCS No. 244 of 2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against defendant Devashibhai Jasabhai Gohil for outstanding electricity dues of Rs. 12,778.21 with 6% annual interest from the claim date until payment. The court found the defendant failed to contest the charges and ordered recovery from his person, movable property, and immovable assets, while rejecting claims for higher interest rates. The defendant was also directed to bear court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts