PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs GU. RANCHHODBHAI NANJIBHAI VALA NA VARAS PUTRA KANJIBHAI RANCHHODBHAI VALA — 238/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060010242025
Filing Number
238/2025
Filing Date
07-10-2025
Registration No
238/2025
Registration Date
07-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
GU. RANCHHODBHAI NANJIBHAI VALA NA VARAS PUTRA KANJIBHAI RANCHHODBHAI VALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS No. 238/2025 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent Ranchhodbhai Nanjibhai Vala. The court ordered the respondent to pay ₹95,411.22 with 6% annual interest from the date of claim until full recovery, and directed recovery from the respondent's property and assets. Key Reasoning: PGVCL (electricity supplier) established that the respondent owed dues for electricity consumption and failed to pay despite notice. The respondent did not contest the charges or appear before the court. The court found PGVCL's documentary evidence reliable and the respondent's electricity connection properly disconnected for non-payment. However, the court reduced the claimed interest rate from 18% to 6% per annum, finding the higher rate excessive under civil procedure principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 238/2025 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent Ranchhodbhai Nanjibhai Vala. The court ordered the respondent to pay ₹95,411.22 with 6% annual interest from the date of claim until full recovery, and directed recovery from the respondent's property and assets. Key Reasoning: PGVCL (electricity supplier) established that the respondent owed dues for electricity consumption and failed to pay despite notice. The respondent did not contest the charges or appear before the court. The court found PGVCL's documentary evidence reliable and the respondent's electricity connection properly disconnected for non-payment. However, the court reduced the claimed interest rate from 18% to 6% per annum, finding the higher rate excessive under civil procedure principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts