PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs BHANAJIBHAI RUDABHAI KANTARIYA — 237/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060010232025
Filing Number
237/2025
Filing Date
07-Oct-2025
Registration No
237/2025
Registration Date
07-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHANAJIBHAI RUDABHAI KANTARIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: RCS No. 237/2025 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Bhanajibhai Rudabhai Kantariya. The court held that the respondent owes Rs. 13,684/08 for unpaid electricity charges and must pay 6% annual interest from the billing date until full recovery. The respondent is liable for all dues, costs, and recovery from his property, with the court pronouncing a decree in favor of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 237/2025
Case Summary: RCS No. 237/2025 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Bhanajibhai Rudabhai Kantariya. The court held that the respondent owes Rs. 13,684/08 for unpaid electricity charges and must pay 6% annual interest from the billing date until full recovery. The respondent is liable for all dues, costs, and recovery from his property, with the court pronouncing a decree in favor of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts