PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs GOBARBHAI VALLABHBHAI — 378/2024

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060009992024

Filing Number

378/2024

Filing Date

19-Sep-2024

Registration No

378/2024

Registration Date

19-Sep-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

    Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOBARBHAI VALLABHBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: RCS No. 378/2024 Parties: PGVCL (Petitioner/Plaintiff) vs. Gobarbhai Vallabhbhai (Respondent/Defendant) Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent for unpaid electricity charges. The court ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 26,313/11 (including late payment charges and DPS amounts) with 6% annual interest from the date of the claim until payment, with the respondent's property liable for recovery. The respondent was also ordered to bear the litigation costs. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent had not paid outstanding electricity dues despite proper notice and disconnection. Since the respondent neither appeared in court nor contested the claim through affidavit or cross-examination, the electricity board's documentary evidence (bills, disconnection records, and affidavits) remained unchallenged and was accepted as genuine proof of the debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 04-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 13-Aug-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 31-Jul-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 26-Jun-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 13-Jun-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 24-Apr-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 20-Mar-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 21-Feb-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 06-Feb-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 02-Jan-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 05-Dec-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 06-Nov-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 19-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 19-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 378/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 378/2024 Parties: PGVCL (Petitioner/Plaintiff) vs. Gobarbhai Vallabhbhai (Respondent/Defendant) Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent for unpaid electricity charges. The court ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 26,313/11 (including late payment charges and DPS amounts) with 6% annual interest from the date of the claim until payment, with the respondent's property liable for recovery. The respondent was also ordered to bear the litigation costs. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent had not paid outstanding electricity dues despite proper notice and disconnection. Since the respondent neither appeared in court nor contested the claim through affidavit or cross-examination, the electricity board's documentary evidence (bills, disconnection records, and affidavits) remained unchallenged and was accepted as genuine proof of the debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case