PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs RAHULBHAI RAMJIBHAI BARAIYA — 98/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060001622025
Filing Number
98/2025
Filing Date
18-01-2025
Registration No
98/2025
Registration Date
18-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
RAHULBHAI RAMJIBHAI BARAIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS No. 98/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's electricity theft claim against respondent Rahulbhai Ramjibhai Baraiya. The court found that the respondent illegally tapped into the power supply and consumed electricity without authorization or proper metering, resulting in unpaid dues of ₹32,219. The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until full recovery, with the utility entitled to recover the amount from the respondent's property if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 98/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's electricity theft claim against respondent Rahulbhai Ramjibhai Baraiya. The court found that the respondent illegally tapped into the power supply and consumed electricity without authorization or proper metering, resulting in unpaid dues of ₹32,219. The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until full recovery, with the utility entitled to recover the amount from the respondent's property if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts