PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs RAHULBHAI RAMJIBHAI BARAIYA — 98/2025

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060001622025

Case disposed

Filing Number

98/2025

Filing Date

18-01-2025

Registration No

98/2025

Registration Date

18-01-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

RAHULBHAI RAMJIBHAI BARAIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

23-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

30-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

19-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

27-11-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: RCS No. 98/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's electricity theft claim against respondent Rahulbhai Ramjibhai Baraiya. The court found that the respondent illegally tapped into the power supply and consumed electricity without authorization or proper metering, resulting in unpaid dues of ₹32,219. The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until full recovery, with the utility entitled to recover the amount from the respondent's property if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 98/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's electricity theft claim against respondent Rahulbhai Ramjibhai Baraiya. The court found that the respondent illegally tapped into the power supply and consumed electricity without authorization or proper metering, resulting in unpaid dues of ₹32,219. The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until full recovery, with the utility entitled to recover the amount from the respondent's property if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case