PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs SHIVABHAI VALABHAI MAKWANA — 97/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060001612025
Filing Number
97/2025
Filing Date
18-01-2025
Registration No
97/2025
Registration Date
18-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
SHIVABHAI VALABHAI MAKWANA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS No. 97/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against respondent Shivabhai Valabhai Makwana for unauthorized electricity consumption. The court found that the respondent illegally drew power directly from PGVCL's distribution line without proper connection, constituting electricity theft. The court awarded the petitioner Rs. 22,910/80 with 6% annual interest from the date of the claim until full payment, and decreed that the respondent's property be attached to recover the dues and costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 97/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against respondent Shivabhai Valabhai Makwana for unauthorized electricity consumption. The court found that the respondent illegally drew power directly from PGVCL's distribution line without proper connection, constituting electricity theft. The court awarded the petitioner Rs. 22,910/80 with 6% annual interest from the date of the claim until full payment, and decreed that the respondent's property be attached to recover the dues and costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts