PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs JAYANTIBHAI KARSHANBHAI BORICHA — 95/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060001592025
Filing Number
95/2025
Filing Date
18-01-2025
Registration No
95/2025
Registration Date
18-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
JAYANTIBHAI KARSHANBHAI BORICHA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: PGVCL Gariyadhar v. Jayantibhai Karshanbhai Boricha (RCS 95/2025) The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent for unauthorized electricity consumption and theft. The respondent illegally drew power directly from PGVCL's distribution line without authorization and without being a registered consumer, resulting in dues of ₹15,622.26. The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until settlement, with recovery from his property if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: PGVCL Gariyadhar v. Jayantibhai Karshanbhai Boricha (RCS 95/2025) The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent for unauthorized electricity consumption and theft. The respondent illegally drew power directly from PGVCL's distribution line without authorization and without being a registered consumer, resulting in dues of ₹15,622.26. The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until settlement, with recovery from his property if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts