PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs JAYABEN PRAVINBHAI KANTARIYA — 92/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060001562025
Filing Number
92/2025
Filing Date
18-01-2025
Registration No
92/2025
Registration Date
18-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
JAYABEN PRAVINBHAI KANTARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 92/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Jayaben Pravinbhai Kantariya for illegal electricity consumption and non-payment. The court found that the respondent unlawfully drew power directly from the utility's line without authorization and failed to pay outstanding dues of ₹19,930/60. The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount with 6% annual interest from the claim date until recovery, plus costs, with attachment of her property as enforcement. The court rejected the claim for 18% interest as excessive under civil procedure law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 92/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Jayaben Pravinbhai Kantariya for illegal electricity consumption and non-payment. The court found that the respondent unlawfully drew power directly from the utility's line without authorization and failed to pay outstanding dues of ₹19,930/60. The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount with 6% annual interest from the claim date until recovery, plus costs, with attachment of her property as enforcement. The court rejected the claim for 18% interest as excessive under civil procedure law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts