PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI BORICHA — 42/2026
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060000802026
Filing Number
42/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
42/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI BORICHA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
WRITTEN STATEMENT
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 29-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT |
| 29-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS 42/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Dhirubhai Naranbhai Boricha for illegal electricity consumption. The court awarded Rs. 25,923/28 paisa in unpaid electricity charges plus 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, with recovery permitted against the defendant's movable and immovable property. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant illegally tapped into the electricity supply line without authorization and consumed power without proper billing. Although the defendant defaulted in appearing before court, documentary evidence including inspection records and bills substantiated PGVCL's claim. The court reduced the requested 18% interest to the statutory 6% rate under CPC Section 34, finding the higher rate excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 42/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Dhirubhai Naranbhai Boricha for illegal electricity consumption. The court awarded Rs. 25,923/28 paisa in unpaid electricity charges plus 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, with recovery permitted against the defendant's movable and immovable property. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant illegally tapped into the electricity supply line without authorization and consumed power without proper billing. Although the defendant defaulted in appearing before court, documentary evidence including inspection records and bills substantiated PGVCL's claim. The court reduced the requested 18% interest to the statutory 6% rate under CPC Section 34, finding the higher rate excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts