PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI BORICHA — 42/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060000802026

Case disposed

Filing Number

42/2026

Filing Date

29-01-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI BORICHA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-05-2026

Disposed

02-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

29-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT

29-01-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: RCS 42/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Dhirubhai Naranbhai Boricha for illegal electricity consumption. The court awarded Rs. 25,923/28 paisa in unpaid electricity charges plus 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, with recovery permitted against the defendant's movable and immovable property. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant illegally tapped into the electricity supply line without authorization and consumed power without proper billing. Although the defendant defaulted in appearing before court, documentary evidence including inspection records and bills substantiated PGVCL's claim. The court reduced the requested 18% interest to the statutory 6% rate under CPC Section 34, finding the higher rate excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 42/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Dhirubhai Naranbhai Boricha for illegal electricity consumption. The court awarded Rs. 25,923/28 paisa in unpaid electricity charges plus 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, with recovery permitted against the defendant's movable and immovable property. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant illegally tapped into the electricity supply line without authorization and consumed power without proper billing. Although the defendant defaulted in appearing before court, documentary evidence including inspection records and bills substantiated PGVCL's claim. The court reduced the requested 18% interest to the statutory 6% rate under CPC Section 34, finding the higher rate excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case