PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs MOHISANBHAI NAJIRBHAI CHAUHAN — 40/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060000782026

Case disposed

Filing Number

40/2026

Filing Date

29-01-2026

Registration No

40/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

MOHISANBHAI NAJIRBHAI CHAUHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-05-2026

Disposed

02-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

29-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT

29-01-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: RCS No. 40 OF 2026 PGVCL Gariyadhar v. Mohisanbhai Najirbhai Chauhan The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim for recovery of Rs. 38,572/68 for unauthorized electricity theft. The court found that the respondent had illegally drawn power directly from the company's line without authorization and ordered recovery of the bill amount plus 6% annual interest from the date of filing until payment. The respondent is also liable to pay costs, and recovery is enforceable against his personal and immovable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 40 OF 2026 PGVCL Gariyadhar v. Mohisanbhai Najirbhai Chauhan The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim for recovery of Rs. 38,572/68 for unauthorized electricity theft. The court found that the respondent had illegally drawn power directly from the company's line without authorization and ordered recovery of the bill amount plus 6% annual interest from the date of filing until payment. The respondent is also liable to pay costs, and recovery is enforceable against his personal and immovable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case