PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs SANGITABEN KANJIBHAI DHAMELIYA — 39/2026
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060000772026
Filing Number
39/2026
Filing Date
29-Jan-2026
Registration No
39/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANGITABEN KANJIBHAI DHAMELIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: RCS No. 39/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Sangitaben Kanjibhai Dhameliya for unauthorized electricity theft and recovery of dues. The court found that the respondent illegally diverted power directly from the company's lines for domestic use without authorization. Key Findings: The court awarded Rs. 35,687.82 with 6% annual interest (from the date of filing the suit until recovery) to be collected from the respondent's person and property. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for 18% interest, applying the standard 6% rate under civil procedure law instead. Costs were imposed on the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2026
Case Summary: RCS No. 39/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Sangitaben Kanjibhai Dhameliya for unauthorized electricity theft and recovery of dues. The court found that the respondent illegally diverted power directly from the company's lines for domestic use without authorization. Key Findings: The court awarded Rs. 35,687.82 with 6% annual interest (from the date of filing the suit until recovery) to be collected from the respondent's person and property. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for 18% interest, applying the standard 6% rate under civil procedure law instead. Costs were imposed on the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts