PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs HAIDARBHAI KARIMBHAI PATHAN NA VARAS PUTRA AKBARBHAI HAIDARBHAI PATHAN — 38/2026
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060000762026
Filing Number
38/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
HAIDARBHAI KARIMBHAI PATHAN NA VARAS PUTRA AKBARBHAI HAIDARBHAI PATHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
WRITTEN STATEMENT
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 29-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT |
| 29-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 38/2026 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim for recovery of ₹13,573/27 paise from the respondent for unauthorized electricity consumption. The court found that the respondent illegally tapped into the power supply and used electricity without authorization, and ordered the respondent to pay the claimed amount plus 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, with the option to recover from the respondent's personal and movable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 38/2026 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim for recovery of ₹13,573/27 paise from the respondent for unauthorized electricity consumption. The court found that the respondent illegally tapped into the power supply and used electricity without authorization, and ordered the respondent to pay the claimed amount plus 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, with the option to recover from the respondent's personal and movable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts