PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs AKBARBHAI HAIDARBHAI PATHAN — 37/2026
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN060000752026
Filing Number
37/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer
Adv. I L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
AKBARBHAI HAIDARBHAI PATHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
WRITTEN STATEMENT
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 29-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT |
| 29-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS No. 37/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Civil Court of Gariyadhar partially allowed PGVCL's claim against respondent Akbarbhai Haidarbhai Pathan for unauthorized electricity consumption. The court awarded Rs. 18,431/08 plus 6% annual interest from the date of suit filing until recovery, determined from meter inspection evidence showing illegal direct wire connections bypassing the company's meter. Key Reasoning: The court found the respondent guilty of electricity theft based on documentary evidence (inspection reports, bills, certificates) and witness testimony, though it reduced the interest rate from the claimed 18% to 6% per annum as per civil procedure norms. The respondent failed to contest the charges or provide counter-evidence despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 37/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Civil Court of Gariyadhar partially allowed PGVCL's claim against respondent Akbarbhai Haidarbhai Pathan for unauthorized electricity consumption. The court awarded Rs. 18,431/08 plus 6% annual interest from the date of suit filing until recovery, determined from meter inspection evidence showing illegal direct wire connections bypassing the company's meter. Key Reasoning: The court found the respondent guilty of electricity theft based on documentary evidence (inspection reports, bills, certificates) and witness testimony, though it reduced the interest rate from the claimed 18% to 6% per annum as per civil procedure norms. The respondent failed to contest the charges or provide counter-evidence despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts