PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs FARUKBHAI UMARBHAI DAL — 35/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060000732026

Case disposed

Filing Number

35/2026

Filing Date

29-01-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

FARUKBHAI UMARBHAI DAL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-05-2026

Disposed

02-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

29-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT

29-01-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Case 35/2026 The Principal Civil Court of Gariyyadhar dismissed PGVCL's claim against Farukbhai Umarbhai Dal for recovery of ₹20,237.53 for alleged unauthorized electricity consumption and related charges. The court found that while PGVCL presented documentary evidence of an inspection report, the documents submitted were not clearly attributable to the named respondent, and PGVCL failed to establish a definitive connection between the respondent and the alleged electricity theft. The court ruled in favor of the respondent and rejected PGVCL's demand with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 35/2026 The Principal Civil Court of Gariyyadhar dismissed PGVCL's claim against Farukbhai Umarbhai Dal for recovery of ₹20,237.53 for alleged unauthorized electricity consumption and related charges. The court found that while PGVCL presented documentary evidence of an inspection report, the documents submitted were not clearly attributable to the named respondent, and PGVCL failed to establish a definitive connection between the respondent and the alleged electricity theft. The court ruled in favor of the respondent and rejected PGVCL's demand with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case