PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs FARUKBHAI UMARBHAI DAL — 35/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060000732026

Filing Number

35/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

    Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FARUKBHAI UMARBHAI DAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 35/2026 The Principal Civil Court of Gariyyadhar dismissed PGVCL's claim against Farukbhai Umarbhai Dal for recovery of ₹20,237.53 for alleged unauthorized electricity consumption and related charges. The court found that while PGVCL presented documentary evidence of an inspection report, the documents submitted were not clearly attributable to the named respondent, and PGVCL failed to establish a definitive connection between the respondent and the alleged electricity theft. The court ruled in favor of the respondent and rejected PGVCL's demand with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 02-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 35/2026 The Principal Civil Court of Gariyyadhar dismissed PGVCL's claim against Farukbhai Umarbhai Dal for recovery of ₹20,237.53 for alleged unauthorized electricity consumption and related charges. The court found that while PGVCL presented documentary evidence of an inspection report, the documents submitted were not clearly attributable to the named respondent, and PGVCL failed to establish a definitive connection between the respondent and the alleged electricity theft. The court ruled in favor of the respondent and rejected PGVCL's demand with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case