PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs AASIFBHAI NASIBBHAI CHAUHAN — 33/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060000712026

Filing Number

33/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

    Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AASIFBHAI NASIBBHAI CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Judegement

    The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim for electricity theft against Aasifbhai Nasibbhai Chauhan. The court found that the respondent had illegally tapped electricity from the petitioner's power line without authorization and ordered him to pay Rs. 13,644/16 paise with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing until recovery, rejecting the petitioner's demand for 18% interest. The court also ordered recovery from the respondent's personal assets and property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 02-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim for electricity theft against Aasifbhai Nasibbhai Chauhan. The court found that the respondent had illegally tapped electricity from the petitioner's power line without authorization and ordered him to pay Rs. 13,644/16 paise with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing until recovery, rejecting the petitioner's demand for 18% interest. The court also ordered recovery from the respondent's personal assets and property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case