PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs MAHESHBHAI RUPABHAI KANTARIYA — 31/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060000692026

Filing Number

31/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

    Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHBHAI RUPABHAI KANTARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Case 31/2026 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against respondent Maheshbhai Rupabhai Kantariya for unauthorized electricity consumption. The court awarded Rs. 20,297.81 plus 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, finding that the respondent had illegally tapped into the power supply line without authorization. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for 18% interest and instead applied the statutory rate of 6% under the Civil Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 02-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 31/2026 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against respondent Maheshbhai Rupabhai Kantariya for unauthorized electricity consumption. The court awarded Rs. 20,297.81 plus 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, finding that the respondent had illegally tapped into the power supply line without authorization. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for 18% interest and instead applied the statutory rate of 6% under the Civil Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case