PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer vs DUDHIBEN BADHABHAI NAGAR — 9/2025

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN060000122025

Case disposed

Filing Number

9/2025

Filing Date

01-01-2025

Registration No

9/2025

Registration Date

01-01-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL Gariyadhar Through Its Deputy Engineer

Adv. I L PARMAR

Respondent(s)

DUDHIBEN BADHABHAI NAGAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

23-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

30-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

19-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

27-11-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: RCS No. 09 of 2025 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Dudhiben Badhabhai Nagar for unauthorized electricity consumption. The court ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 28,040/10 with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until full payment, and directed recovery from the respondent's property. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for 18% interest, awarding only 6% instead. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent illegally drew electricity directly from PGVCL's power line without authorization or proper connection, constituting electricity theft. The court accepted the petitioner's evidence and documentary proofs while noting the respondent failed to appear or contest the claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 09 of 2025 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against Dudhiben Badhabhai Nagar for unauthorized electricity consumption. The court ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 28,040/10 with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until full payment, and directed recovery from the respondent's property. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for 18% interest, awarding only 6% instead. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent illegally drew electricity directly from PGVCL's power line without authorization or proper connection, constituting electricity theft. The court accepted the petitioner's evidence and documentary proofs while noting the respondent failed to appear or contest the claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GARIADHAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case