P.G.V.C.L RURAL-2 MAHUVA vs BATUKBHAI NATHABHAI PARMAR — 349/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 060,0450. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 02nd May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN050034682025
Filing Number
349/2025
Filing Date
24-Nov-2025
Registration No
349/2025
Registration Date
24-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.G.V.C.L RURAL-2 MAHUVA
Adv. K V VAIDYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BATUKBHAI NATHABHAI PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court partially allowed P.G.V.C.L Rural-2 Mahuva's electricity bill recovery suit against Batukbhai Nathabhai Parmar, awarding Rs. 58,699.16 for unauthorized electricity consumption, plus 6% annual interest from the bill date until payment. The respondent was ordered to pay the electricity charges separately, with the court finding he illegally drew power directly from the company's line without authorization, constituting theft of electricity under company regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
Issues
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 349/2025
The court partially allowed P.G.V.C.L Rural-2 Mahuva's electricity bill recovery suit against Batukbhai Nathabhai Parmar, awarding Rs. 58,699.16 for unauthorized electricity consumption, plus 6% annual interest from the bill date until payment. The respondent was ordered to pay the electricity charges separately, with the court finding he illegally drew power directly from the company's line without authorization, constituting theft of electricity under company regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts