THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRADIPBHAI MADHUBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R S BHALIYA — 1861/2024
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116(B),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN050026672024
Filing Number
1861/2024
Filing Date
09-10-2024
Registration No
1861/2024
Registration Date
09-10-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198035240737
Police Station
MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRADIPBHAI MADHUBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R S BHALIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 09-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 05-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 04-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki (C.C.No.1861/2024) The court acquitted respondent Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite seizure of foreign liquor bottles worth ₹3,000 and witness statements, the prosecution's evidence—primarily from five police witnesses—contained significant gaps: the five panch witnesses were not properly examined, no independent witnesses corroborated the recovery, FSL report on seized liquor was not submitted, and the property chain was not adequately established. The court held the prosecution bore the burden of proving guilt conclusively and absent cogent evidence, the accused's presumption of innocence prevailed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki (C.C.No.1861/2024) The court acquitted respondent Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite seizure of foreign liquor bottles worth ₹3,000 and witness statements, the prosecution's evidence—primarily from five police witnesses—contained significant gaps: the five panch witnesses were not properly examined, no independent witnesses corroborated the recovery, FSL report on seized liquor was not submitted, and the property chain was not adequately established. The court held the prosecution bore the burden of proving guilt conclusively and absent cogent evidence, the accused's presumption of innocence prevailed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts