THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRADIPBHAI MADHUBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R S BHALIYA — 1861/2024

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116(B),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN050026672024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1861/2024

Filing Date

09-10-2024

Registration No

1861/2024

Registration Date

09-10-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198035240737

Police Station

MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116(B),81

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PRADIPBHAI MADHUBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R S BHALIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

23-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

09-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

05-01-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

04-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki (C.C.No.1861/2024) The court acquitted respondent Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite seizure of foreign liquor bottles worth ₹3,000 and witness statements, the prosecution's evidence—primarily from five police witnesses—contained significant gaps: the five panch witnesses were not properly examined, no independent witnesses corroborated the recovery, FSL report on seized liquor was not submitted, and the property chain was not adequately established. The court held the prosecution bore the burden of proving guilt conclusively and absent cogent evidence, the accused's presumption of innocence prevailed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki (C.C.No.1861/2024) The court acquitted respondent Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite seizure of foreign liquor bottles worth ₹3,000 and witness statements, the prosecution's evidence—primarily from five police witnesses—contained significant gaps: the five panch witnesses were not properly examined, no independent witnesses corroborated the recovery, FSL report on seized liquor was not submitted, and the property chain was not adequately established. The court held the prosecution bore the burden of proving guilt conclusively and absent cogent evidence, the accused's presumption of innocence prevailed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case