THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRADIPBHAI MADHUBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R S BHALIYA — 1861/2024
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116(B),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN050026672024
Filing Number
1861/2024
Filing Date
09-Oct-2024
Registration No
1861/2024
Registration Date
09-Oct-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198035240737
Police Station
MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRADIPBHAI MADHUBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R S BHALIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki (C.C.No.1861/2024) The court acquitted respondent Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite seizure of foreign liquor bottles worth ₹3,000 and witness statements, the prosecution's evidence—primarily from five police witnesses—contained significant gaps: the five panch witnesses were not properly examined, no independent witnesses corroborated the recovery, FSL report on seized liquor was not submitted, and the property chain was not adequately established. The court held the prosecution bore the burden of proving guilt conclusively and absent cogent evidence, the accused's presumption of innocence prevailed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jan-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jun-2025
Plea
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-May-2025
Plea
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Apr-2025
Plea
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Jan-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1861/2024
Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki (C.C.No.1861/2024) The court acquitted respondent Pradipbhai Madhubhai Solanki of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite seizure of foreign liquor bottles worth ₹3,000 and witness statements, the prosecution's evidence—primarily from five police witnesses—contained significant gaps: the five panch witnesses were not properly examined, no independent witnesses corroborated the recovery, FSL report on seized liquor was not submitted, and the property chain was not adequately established. The court held the prosecution bore the burden of proving guilt conclusively and absent cogent evidence, the accused's presumption of innocence prevailed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts