THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAVINBHAI POPATBHAI BAMBHANIYA Advocate - R K MAKWANA — 1393/2024

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN050020172024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1393/2024

Filing Date

12-08-2024

Registration No

1393/2024

Registration Date

12-08-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198070240157

Police Station

MAHUVA RURAL POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PRAVINBHAI POPATBHAI BAMBHANIYA Advocate - R K MAKWANA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PLEA

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

19-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

12-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court sentenced the accused Pravinbhai Popatbhai Bambhaniya to a fine of Rs. 100 (with simple imprisonment of five days as alternative) under the Prohibition Act Section 64(1), while imposing lenient punishment instead of the maximum sentence. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's impoverished status, family responsibilities, first-time offense, and potential hardships of imprisonment on his family's economic conditions, citing precedent judgments that permit reduced sentencing for special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court sentenced the accused Pravinbhai Popatbhai Bambhaniya to a fine of Rs. 100 (with simple imprisonment of five days as alternative) under the Prohibition Act Section 64(1), while imposing lenient punishment instead of the maximum sentence. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's impoverished status, family responsibilities, first-time offense, and potential hardships of imprisonment on his family's economic conditions, citing precedent judgments that permit reduced sentencing for special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case