THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAVINBHAI POPATBHAI BAMBHANIYA Advocate - R K MAKWANA — 1393/2024
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN050020172024
Filing Number
1393/2024
Filing Date
12-08-2024
Registration No
1393/2024
Registration Date
12-08-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198070240157
Police Station
MAHUVA RURAL POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRAVINBHAI POPATBHAI BAMBHANIYA Advocate - R K MAKWANA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 19-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 12-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court sentenced the accused Pravinbhai Popatbhai Bambhaniya to a fine of Rs. 100 (with simple imprisonment of five days as alternative) under the Prohibition Act Section 64(1), while imposing lenient punishment instead of the maximum sentence. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's impoverished status, family responsibilities, first-time offense, and potential hardships of imprisonment on his family's economic conditions, citing precedent judgments that permit reduced sentencing for special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court sentenced the accused Pravinbhai Popatbhai Bambhaniya to a fine of Rs. 100 (with simple imprisonment of five days as alternative) under the Prohibition Act Section 64(1), while imposing lenient punishment instead of the maximum sentence. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's impoverished status, family responsibilities, first-time offense, and potential hardships of imprisonment on his family's economic conditions, citing precedent judgments that permit reduced sentencing for special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts