THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KISHORBHAI BHARATBHAI CHAVDA Advocate - R B BAMBHANIYA — 1353/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN050020102025
Filing Number
1353/2025
Filing Date
02-Jul-2025
Registration No
1353/2025
Registration Date
02-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198030250095
Police Station
KHUNTWADA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KISHORBHAI BHARATBHAI CHAVDA Advocate - R B BAMBHANIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (Prohibition Act) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 instead of imprisonment, considering his poor economic condition, family dependence, and lack of prior criminal history as special mitigating circumstances. The judgment emphasizes that imprisonment would adversely affect his family's livelihood and that a fine-only sentence adequately serves the ends of justice in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Plea
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Plea
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2026
Plea
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Plea
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Oct-2025
Plea
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1353/2025
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (Prohibition Act) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 instead of imprisonment, considering his poor economic condition, family dependence, and lack of prior criminal history as special mitigating circumstances. The judgment emphasizes that imprisonment would adversely affect his family's livelihood and that a fine-only sentence adequately serves the ends of justice in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts