THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAVJIBHAI VALABHAI BARAIYA Advocate - R S BHALIYA — 1099/2024
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN050015672024
Filing Number
1099/2024
Filing Date
18-06-2024
Registration No
1099/2024
Registration Date
18-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198035240368
Police Station
MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAVJIBHAI VALABHAI BARAIYA Advocate - R S BHALIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 01-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C. No. 1099/2024 The State of Gujarat v. Ravjibhai Valabhai Baraiya Court Decision: The accused Ravjibhai Valabhai Baraiya was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act (Section 65(a)(a)). The court found the prosecution's case fundamentally flawed due to procedural irregularities in the investigation and lack of credible witness corroboration. The only independent witnesses (panchas) did not support the state's version, and critical investigative procedures were compromised, rendering the evidence unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C. No. 1099/2024 The State of Gujarat v. Ravjibhai Valabhai Baraiya Court Decision: The accused Ravjibhai Valabhai Baraiya was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act (Section 65(a)(a)). The court found the prosecution's case fundamentally flawed due to procedural irregularities in the investigation and lack of credible witness corroboration. The only independent witnesses (panchas) did not support the state's version, and critical investigative procedures were compromised, rendering the evidence unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts