THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAKASHBHAI BABUBHAI SHIYAL Advocate - P U GAUSWAMI — 1077/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN050014512025
Filing Number
1077/2025
Filing Date
16-May-2025
Registration No
1077/2025
Registration Date
16-May-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198070250023
Police Station
MAHUVA RURAL POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAKASHBHAI BABUBHAI SHIYAL Advocate - P U GAUSWAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted the accused Prakashbhai Babubhai Shiyal under IPC Section 294(1) (obscene act in public) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (rupees one hundred only) with a default imprisonment of 5 days. The court considered mitigating circumstances including the accused's poor economic condition, family responsibilities, and that imprisonment would adversely affect his dependents, warranting reduction of the sentence to only a fine rather than imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Plea
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1077/2025
The court convicted the accused Prakashbhai Babubhai Shiyal under IPC Section 294(1) (obscene act in public) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (rupees one hundred only) with a default imprisonment of 5 days. The court considered mitigating circumstances including the accused's poor economic condition, family responsibilities, and that imprisonment would adversely affect his dependents, warranting reduction of the sentence to only a fine rather than imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts