THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAKASHBHAI BABUBHAI SHIYAL Advocate - P U GAUSWAMI — 1077/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN050014512025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1077/2025

Filing Date

16-05-2025

Registration No

1077/2025

Registration Date

16-05-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198070250023

Police Station

MAHUVA RURAL POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PRAKASHBHAI BABUBHAI SHIYAL Advocate - P U GAUSWAMI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PLEA

27-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

13-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

18-11-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused Prakashbhai Babubhai Shiyal under IPC Section 294(1) (obscene act in public) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (rupees one hundred only) with a default imprisonment of 5 days. The court considered mitigating circumstances including the accused's poor economic condition, family responsibilities, and that imprisonment would adversely affect his dependents, warranting reduction of the sentence to only a fine rather than imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Prakashbhai Babubhai Shiyal under IPC Section 294(1) (obscene act in public) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (rupees one hundred only) with a default imprisonment of 5 days. The court considered mitigating circumstances including the accused's poor economic condition, family responsibilities, and that imprisonment would adversely affect his dependents, warranting reduction of the sentence to only a fine rather than imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case