THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HARESHBHAI BHARATBHAI BARAIYA Advocate - R S BHALIYA — 1028/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN050014022025
Filing Number
1028/2025
Filing Date
15-05-2025
Registration No
1028/2025
Registration Date
15-05-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198070250191
Police Station
MAHUVA RURAL POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HARESHBHAI BHARATBHAI BARAIYA Advocate - R S BHALIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 26-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 18-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court sentenced the respondent Hareshbhai Bharatbhai Baraiya to a fine of Rs. 100 (one hundred rupees only) under Section 275(1) of the IPC for a Prohibition Act violation, with an alternate sentence of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum, considering the respondent's impoverished circumstances, family dependence, first-time offense, and the adverse impact imprisonment would have on his family's welfare and sustenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court sentenced the respondent Hareshbhai Bharatbhai Baraiya to a fine of Rs. 100 (one hundred rupees only) under Section 275(1) of the IPC for a Prohibition Act violation, with an alternate sentence of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum, considering the respondent's impoverished circumstances, family dependence, first-time offense, and the adverse impact imprisonment would have on his family's welfare and sustenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts