THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJAYBHAI JENTIBHAI DABHI Advocate - R S BHALIYA — 1026/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN050014002025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1026/2025

Filing Date

15-05-2025

Registration No

1026/2025

Registration Date

15-05-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198070250200

Police Station

MAHUVA RURAL POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

AJAYBHAI JENTIBHAI DABHI Advocate - R S BHALIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PLEA

26-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

13-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

18-11-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Gujarat High Court convicted respondent Ajaybhai Jentibhai Dabhi under IPC Section 275 (Prohibition Act offense) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100, with 5 days simple imprisonment as default. The court considered the respondent's poor financial condition, family dependence, and first-time offense as special reasons to impose the minimum sentence rather than maximum punishment, noting that jail imprisonment would adversely affect his family's welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court convicted respondent Ajaybhai Jentibhai Dabhi under IPC Section 275 (Prohibition Act offense) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100, with 5 days simple imprisonment as default. The court considered the respondent's poor financial condition, family dependence, and first-time offense as special reasons to impose the minimum sentence rather than maximum punishment, noting that jail imprisonment would adversely affect his family's welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case