THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DAYABHAI GIGABHAI SHIYAL Advocate - R S BHALIYA — 839/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN050011802025

Filing Number

839/2025

Filing Date

25-Apr-2025

Registration No

839/2025

Registration Date

25-Apr-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198035240746

Police Station

MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAYABHAI GIGABHAI SHIYAL Advocate - R S BHALIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Section 54(1) of the Prohibition Act 2003 but reduced the sentence to a fine of ₹100 instead of imprisonment, considering mitigating factors including the accused's poor economic condition, family dependence, and lack of prior criminal history. The court found that while the minimum prescribed punishment applied, special circumstances warranted imposing a lenient sentence, and noted that imprisonment would adversely affect the accused's family and economic situation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Dec-2025

    Restored

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 13-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 13-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 13-Dec-2025

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 13-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 11-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 12-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 30-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 25-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 25-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 839/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 54(1) of the Prohibition Act 2003 but reduced the sentence to a fine of ₹100 instead of imprisonment, considering mitigating factors including the accused's poor economic condition, family dependence, and lack of prior criminal history. The court found that while the minimum prescribed punishment applied, special circumstances warranted imposing a lenient sentence, and noted that imprisonment would adversely affect the accused's family and economic situation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case