THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHYAMBHAI JAYVANTBHAI JANI Advocate - M M SORTHIYA — 756/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN050010872025
Filing Number
756/2025
Filing Date
21-04-2025
Registration No
756/2025
Registration Date
21-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198035250206
Police Station
MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHYAMBHAI JAYVANTBHAI JANI Advocate - M M SORTHIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 20-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 12-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted Shyambhai Jayvantbhai Jani under Section 56(1)(b) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and imposed reduced sentences of ₹100 (instead of ₹200) and ₹2,100 (instead of ₹2,100) under different sections, along with three days simple imprisonment as an alternative if fines were not paid. The court exercised leniency considering the accused's poor economic condition, family responsibilities, and adverse impact of imprisonment on his dependents, finding sufficient grounds to impose lesser punishment than the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted Shyambhai Jayvantbhai Jani under Section 56(1)(b) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and imposed reduced sentences of ₹100 (instead of ₹200) and ₹2,100 (instead of ₹2,100) under different sections, along with three days simple imprisonment as an alternative if fines were not paid. The court exercised leniency considering the accused's poor economic condition, family responsibilities, and adverse impact of imprisonment on his dependents, finding sufficient grounds to impose lesser punishment than the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts