THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KISHORBHAI LAKHABHAI DODIYA Advocate - M M SORTHIYA — 725/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN050010542025
Filing Number
725/2025
Filing Date
19-04-2025
Registration No
725/2025
Registration Date
19-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198035250228
Police Station
MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KISHORBHAI LAKHABHAI DODIYA Advocate - M M SORTHIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 19-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 12-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 725/2025 The Gujarat High Court (Mehsana Bench) reduced the sentence of Kishorbhai Lakhabhai Dodiya, convicted under Section 54(1) of the Prohibition Act 2003, from the minimum prescribed fine of ₹100 to ₹0 with 5 days simple imprisonment instead. The court exercised its discretionary power to impose a reduced sentence citing special circumstances: the accused's impoverished status, sole responsibility for family sustenance, first-time offender status, and genuine remorse—factors indicating that imprisonment would adversely impact his dependents' welfare and socioeconomic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 725/2025 The Gujarat High Court (Mehsana Bench) reduced the sentence of Kishorbhai Lakhabhai Dodiya, convicted under Section 54(1) of the Prohibition Act 2003, from the minimum prescribed fine of ₹100 to ₹0 with 5 days simple imprisonment instead. The court exercised its discretionary power to impose a reduced sentence citing special circumstances: the accused's impoverished status, sole responsibility for family sustenance, first-time offender status, and genuine remorse—factors indicating that imprisonment would adversely impact his dependents' welfare and socioeconomic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts