THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAKASHBHAI DHIRUBHAI SHIYAL Advocate - P U GAUSWAMI — 702/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN050010312025
Filing Number
702/2025
Filing Date
19-04-2025
Registration No
702/2025
Registration Date
19-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198035230898
Police Station
MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRAKASHBHAI DHIRUBHAI SHIYAL Advocate - P U GAUSWAMI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 19-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 12-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 702/2025 The Gujarat High Court convicted the respondent Prakashbhai Dhirubhai Shiyal under Section 54(1) of the Prohibition Act, imposing a fine of ₹100 instead of the minimum statutory penalty, citing special circumstances including the accused's economic hardship and family dependence. The court exercised discretion to impose a lenient sentence below the minimum prescribed punishment, considering the accused's impoverished status, family obligations, and potential adverse impact of imprisonment on dependents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 702/2025 The Gujarat High Court convicted the respondent Prakashbhai Dhirubhai Shiyal under Section 54(1) of the Prohibition Act, imposing a fine of ₹100 instead of the minimum statutory penalty, citing special circumstances including the accused's economic hardship and family dependence. The court exercised discretion to impose a lenient sentence below the minimum prescribed punishment, considering the accused's impoverished status, family obligations, and potential adverse impact of imprisonment on dependents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts