THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LALJIBHAI SAVJIBHAI JOLIYA — 701/2025
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN050010302025
Filing Number
701/2025
Filing Date
19-04-2025
Registration No
701/2025
Registration Date
19-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198035240383
Police Station
MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LALJIBHAI SAVJIBHAI JOLIYA
PRADIPBHAI BHAVANBHAI GOHIL
HARESHBHAI VANABHAI SHIYAL
CHETANBHAI RAGABHAI SANKHAT
VALLABHBHAI KHODABHAI SHIYAL
RAJU KALYANJI KANUBHAI BARAIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 19-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 12-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted respondents 1, 3, 4, and 5 under Gujarat Penal Code Section 12 for committing offences, sentencing each to a fine of ₹200 (or three days imprisonment in default). The court found their confessions credible and, considering their economic and social circumstances as first-time offenders, imposed lenient punishment. Respondents 2 and 6's previous convictions were also considered in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court convicted respondents 1, 3, 4, and 5 under Gujarat Penal Code Section 12 for committing offences, sentencing each to a fine of ₹200 (or three days imprisonment in default). The court found their confessions credible and, considering their economic and social circumstances as first-time offenders, imposed lenient punishment. Respondents 2 and 6's previous convictions were also considered in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts